Campaign Assessment · May 20, 2026
Soulful Sales Toolkit
TOF · Cold Broad
April 23 – May 20, 2026 · Alyssa Nobriga International · Campaign ID 120250811492720339
Amount Spent
$2708
April 23 – May 20, 2026
Website Leads
263
CPL $10.31
Total Revenue
$1302
12 purchases
Purchase ROAS
0.48x
Target: 1.0x+
Avg Order Value
$108.50
Cost per Purchase
$226
Blended across all products
Impressions
44,754
Reach
16,832
Frequency
2.66×
CPM
$60.61
CTR (All)
2.57%
Link CTR
1.43%
Initiate Checkout
304
LPV → IC Rate
49.0%
02 · Campaign Overview
Full Performance Summary
Lifetime data from April 23 – May 20, 2026. Note that May 20, 2026 data is partial and subject to change.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Amount Spent | $2,712.35 |
| Impressions | 44,754 |
| Reach (Accounts Center) | 16,832 |
| Frequency | 2.66× |
| CPM | $60.61 |
| CTR (All) | 2.57% |
| Inline Link CTR | 1.43% |
| Link Clicks | 642 |
| Landing Page Views | 621 |
| Initiate Checkout | 304 |
| Website Leads | 263 |
| Total Purchases | 12 |
| Total Revenue | $1,304.00 |
| Cost per Result (CPL) | $10.31 |
| Blended Cost per Purchase | $226.03 |
| Purchase ROAS | 0.4808× |
| Average Order Value | $108.67 |
03 · Sales Breakdown
Actual Sales Performance
12 purchases across four products generated $1,304.00 in total revenue. Visibility and Clients ($197) dominates with 75.5% of all revenue despite not being the designated tripwire — a critical signal for the strategic decision ahead.
Coaches Template Bundle
Underperforming$141
3 units @ $47
10.8%
of revenue
Soulful Sales Series
Neutral$97
1 units @ $97
7.4%
of revenue
Visibility and Clients
Top Performer$985
5 units @ $197
75.5%
of revenue
Client Magnet Method
Efficient$81
3 units @ $27
6.2%
of revenue
Revenue by Product
Total: $1,304.00 across 12 units
Revenue Share
Visibility & Clients dominates at 75.5%
- Template Bundle
- Soulful Sales Series
- Visibility & Clients
- Client Magnet
04 · Funnel Analysis
Drop-off Points & Conversion Rates
The top-of-funnel creative performance is strong. The critical failure point is the transition from Landing page views to Initiate checkout, where 51% of visitors leave without taking action.
Funnel Volume
Impressions
Link Clicks
Landing Page Views
Initiate Checkout
Website Leads
Purchases
Stage-by-Stage Conversion Rates
Link Clicks → Landing Page Views
96.7%
HealthyLanding Page Views → Initiate Checkout
⚑ Primary bottleneck
49%
CriticalInitiate Checkout → Website Leads
86.5%
HealthyWebsite Leads → Purchases
⚑ Core scaling constraint
4.6%
Needs AttentionKey Insight: The 49% Mid-Funnel Drop-Off
Improving this single stage from 49% to 60–65% would generate ~30–33% more leads at the same ad spend, directly reducing the CPL from $10.31 toward the $7–8 range — without changing a single ad.
Post-Opt-In Funnel Detail
304
Initiate Checkout
Started the opt-in process
263
Website Leads
86.5% of IC — healthy completion rate
12
Purchases (All)
4.6% of leads — core scaling constraint
05 · Ad Creatives
Creative Performance
The campaign runs 8 static image creatives within a single ad set. Images A and B have been running since April 23 and have accumulated meaningful data. Images C–H were launched on May 19, 2026 and are still in the learning phase — no performance conclusions should be drawn from them until after May 26.
Images C–H: Learning Phase (Launched May 19, 2026)
These six creatives have been live for less than 48 hours. Their rankings show as "Unknown" — this is expected and normal. Allow 5–7 days before making any decisions. Turn off any that do not convert after that window.
Established Ads — Meaningful Data
Image A
76.2% of total budget
$2,066.90
spent
205
Website Leads
6
Purchases
$10.08
CPL
Image B
16.1% of total budget
$435.89
spent
50
Website Leads
4
Purchases
$8.72
CPL
Learning Phase Ads — Launched May 19, 2026
| Creative | Spend | Impressions | CPM | CTR | Leads | Purchases | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image C | $0.25 | 18 | $13.89 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | Learning |
| Image D | $47.79 | 1,143 | $41.81 | 3.59% | 0 | 2 | Learning |
| Image E | $143.07 | 4,133 | $34.62 | 3.85% | 7 | 0 | Learning |
| Image F | $5.55 | 148 | $37.50 | 2.03% | 0 | 0 | Learning |
| Image G | $12.37 | 310 | $39.90 | 3.55% | 1 | 0 | Learning |
| Image H | $0.65 | 25 | $26.00 | 4.00% | 0 | 0 | Learning |
CPM by Creative
Campaign average CPM: $60.61 — Images A & B are above average, reflecting more competitive auctions for higher-intent audiences
06 · Scaling Economics
The CPL vs. Funnel Economics Gap
At the current 4.6% lead-to-purchase rate and $108.67 average order value, the funnel requires a CPL below $4.96 just to break even. The current CPL of $10.31 is more than double that threshold. Scaling budget at this point would proportionally increase losses.
Maximum Sustainable CPL by Target ROAS
Based on 4.6% lead→purchase rate and $108.67 avg order value
Break-Even Analysis
| Target ROAS | Max CPL | Current CPL | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0x (Break-even) | $4.96 | $10.31 | $-5.35 |
| 1.5x | $3.31 | $10.31 | $-7.00 |
| 2.0x | $2.48 | $10.31 | $-7.83 |
| 3.0x | $1.65 | $10.31 | $-8.66 |
Two Paths to Closing the Gap
Increase lead-to-purchase rate from 4.6% → ~10%. At 10%, the break-even CPL rises to $10.87 — making the funnel viable at the current CPL.
Increase average order value by driving more leads to the $197 Visibility and Clients offer, which already accounts for 75.5% of revenue.
⚠ Do Not Scale Budget Until ROAS Exceeds 1.0x
Scaling before break-even proportionally increases losses. Fix the funnel economics first.
07 · Strategic Decisions
The Path Forward
Three interconnected decisions shape the strategy: whether to retarget existing leads to Visibility and Clients, whether to launch a new funnel with it as the front-end offer, and whether to run it alongside the existing funnel or replace it.
Should you retarget existing leads to Visibility and Clients?
Yes — act now.
263 warm leads who didn't buy the tripwire. Some are already finding and buying V&C on their own. A dedicated retargeting campaign systematically exposes the rest at minimal cost.
Should you launch a new V&C funnel?
Yes — in parallel.
The V&C signal is compelling but not yet conclusive. Run a separate campaign at the same $75/day budget with identical targeting. The only variable should be the funnel itself.
Should you shut down the existing funnel?
Not yet.
Images A & B have Above average Conversion rate rankings. Images C–H are still in learning. Make the consolidation decision after 14–21 days of parallel data.
Prioritised Action Plan
Click any recommendation to expand the full rationale and implementation detail.
You have 263 warm Website leads who opted in but did not purchase the tripwire. Retarget them directly to Visibility and Clients ($197). This is the highest-confidence, lowest-risk action available — some leads are already finding and buying this offer on their own (5 sales, 75.5% of all revenue). A dedicated retargeting campaign systematically exposes the rest.
The retargeting creative should bridge the gap explicitly: acknowledge that the lead has the Soulful Sales Toolkit and position Visibility and Clients as the implementation layer — what to do with the strategy once you have it. Short-form video testimonial or a direct 'here's what's inside' format tends to perform well for warm audiences at this price point.
Images C–H were launched on May 19, 2026 and have been live for less than 48 hours. Their current data is not meaningful. No creative decisions should be made until they have had 5–7 days to accumulate data. Turn off any that do not convert after that window.
The plan to evaluate after 5–7 days and turn off non-converters is the correct approach. Allow the system to allocate spend naturally during this period before making any decisions.
Run a new Visibility and Clients funnel as a separate campaign — not a replacement. Use identical targeting (cold broad), the same $75/day budget, and the same creative approach so that the only variable is the funnel itself. Run both for a minimum of 14 days before drawing conclusions.
Compare blended ROAS, not just CPL. If the Visibility and Clients funnel generates a higher CPL but a better ROAS because the offer converts at a higher rate or higher price, it is the superior funnel. The case for shutting down the existing funnel becomes stronger only after 14–21 days of parallel data.
The 49% conversion rate from Landing page views to Initiate checkout is the single largest lever in the existing funnel. Test a simplified opt-in page with a stronger, more specific value proposition tied directly to the Coaches Template Bundle.
A/B test the headline, the lead magnet framing, and the call-to-action copy. Improving this stage from 49% to 60–65% would generate materially more leads at the same ad spend, directly reducing the CPL without any change to the creative.
The Coaches Template Bundle sold only 3 units from 263 leads — a 1.1% tripwire conversion rate. The thank-you page or upsell page should directly answer: 'You just got the strategy — here are the exact templates that let you implement it in the next 30 minutes.'
The offer needs to feel like the natural, immediate next step, not a separate product. The transition from the Soulful Sales Toolkit opt-in to the Template Bundle offer needs to be more explicit.
At the current 4.6% lead-to-purchase rate and $108.67 average order value, the funnel requires a CPL below $4.96 to break even. The current CPL of $10.31 is more than double that threshold. Scaling budget before improving the conversion rate or average order value will proportionally increase losses.
The priority is to improve the post-opt-in conversion rate to at least 8–10% before considering a meaningful budget increase. The two fastest paths: increase the lead-to-purchase rate (from 4.6% → 10%), or increase the average order value by driving more leads to the $197 Visibility and Clients offer.